Adaptive design methods in clinical trials – a review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 May 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
- Vol. 3 (1) , 11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-3-11
Abstract
In recent years, the use of adaptive design methods in clinical research and development based on accrued data has become very popular due to its flexibility and efficiency. Based on adaptations applied, adaptive designs can be classified into three categories: prospective, concurrent (ad hoc), and retrospective adaptive designs. An adaptive design allows modifications made to trial and/or statistical procedures of ongoing clinical trials. However, it is a concern that the actual patient population after the adaptations could deviate from the originally target patient population and consequently the overall type I error (to erroneously claim efficacy for an infective drug) rate may not be controlled. In addition, major adaptations of trial and/or statistical procedures of on-going trials may result in a totally different trial that is unable to address the scientific/medical questions the trial intends to answer. In this article, several commonly considered adaptive designs in clinical trials are reviewed. Impacts of ad hoc adaptations (protocol amendments), challenges in by design (prospective) adaptations, and obstacles of retrospective adaptations are described. Strategies for the use of adaptive design in clinical development of rare diseases are discussed. Some examples concerning the development of Velcade intended for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are given. Practical issues that are commonly encountered when implementing adaptive design methods in clinical trials are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Analysis for Two-Stage Seamless Design with Different Study EndpointsJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2007
- Adapting the sample size planning of a phase III trial based on phase II dataPharmaceutical Statistics, 2006
- Group sequential, sample size re‐estimation and two‐stage adaptive designs in clinical trials: a comparisonStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Sample size recalculation for binary data in internal pilot study designsPharmaceutical Statistics, 2004
- Adaptive urn designs for estimating several percentiles of a dose–response curveStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- On the inefficiency of the adaptive design for monitoring clinical trialsBiometrika, 2003
- A Unified Theory of Two-Stage Adaptive DesignsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2002
- Estimating a treatment effect in survival studies in which patients switch treatmentStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Group sequential procedures: Calendar versus information timeStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- The Adaptive Biased Coin Design for Sequential ExperimentsThe Annals of Statistics, 1978