Another look at confidence limits for species proportions
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Paleontology
- Vol. 64 (5) , 842-843
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s002233600001903x
Abstract
In paleontological investigations the number of individuals of a particular species, ni, is often expressed as a proportion of the total number of individuals, ∑i=1S ni = n, for all, S, species. This proportion, p = ni/n expressed in percent, is referred to by various authors as percent species, relative abundance, percentage abundance, species frequency, fractional abundance, and so on. Naturally, researchers are interested in the confidence limits that can be placed on these estimates, and in the number of individuals required to obtain them. The binomial distribution was used by Dryden (1931), Dennison and Hay (1967), Wright and Hay (1971), and Patterson and Fishbein (1989) for this purpose.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial distribution of Miocene foraminifera at Calvert Cliffs, MarylandSmithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 1990
- Re-examination of the statistical methods used to determine the number of point counts needed for micropaleontological quantitative researchJournal of Paleontology, 1989
- Supposed Permo-Triassic megashear between Laurasia and GondwanaNature, 1983
- Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Koobi Fora hominid-bearing depositsNature, 1982
- Palaeontological documentation of speciation in Cenozoic molluscs from Turkana BasinNature, 1981
- Accuracy in Percentage Representation of Heavy Mineral FrequenciesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1931
- A Comparison of the Permian freshwater Lamellibranchiata from Russia with those from the Karoo System of South AfricaQuarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 1895
- Coquilles du Haut-SenegalBulletin de la Société zoologique de France., 1886