Low-Risk Investing Without Industry Bets
Preprint
- 10 May 2013
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The strategy of buying safe low-beta stocks while shorting (or underweighting) riskier high-beta stocks has been shown to deliver significant risk-adjusted returns. However, it has been suggested that such “low-risk investing” delivers high returns primarily due to its industry bet, favoring a slowly changing set of stodgy, stable industries and disliking their opposites. We refute this. We show that a betting against beta (BAB) strategy has delivered positive returns both as an industry-neutral bet within each industry and as a pure bet across industries. In fact, the industry-neutral BAB strategy has performed stronger than the BAB strategy that only bets across industries and it has delivered positive returns in each of 49 U.S. industries and in 61 of 70 global industries. Our findings are consistent with the leverage aversion theory for why low beta investing is effective.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality Minus JunkSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- Low Risk Stocks Outperform within All Observable Markets of the WorldSSRN Electronic Journal, 2012
- Leverage Aversion and Risk ParityCFA Magazine, 2012
- Benchmarks as Limits to Arbitrage: Understanding the Low-Volatility AnomalyCFA Magazine, 2011
- Investing BasicsPublished by Wiley ,2010
- High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns: International and further U.S. evidenceJournal of Financial Economics, 2009
- The Volatility EffectThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 2007
- The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2006
- Predicting Stock Returns Using Industry-Relative Firm CharacteristicsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted BorrowingThe Journal of Business, 1972