Dual Electrode Stimulation Using the Nucleus CI24RE Cochlear Implant: Electrode Impedance and Pitch Ranking Studies
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 26 (5) , 504-511
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000179693.32989.84
Abstract
The first aim of the study was to determine the reduction in electrode impedances using dual electrode stimulation compared with single electrode stimulation in the new Nucleus CI24RE receiver-stimulator. The CI24RE is connected to the Nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear array. Dual electrode stimulation is produced by electrically coupling two adjacent single electrodes. The second aim was to determine whether dual electrode stimulation produced pitch percepts that were intermediate to the pitch of the two adjacent single electrodes. Eight postlingually hearing-impaired adults with severe to profound loss, implanted with the CI24RE, participated in the study. Electrode impedances were measured by using the standard telemetry function of the system. A pitch ranking task was used to measure pitch for dual and single electrodes. Seven sets of three electrodes along the electrode array were tested. Each set of electrodes consisted of a dual electrode and the two adjacent single electrodes. Pitch ranking was measured using a two-alternative forced choice procedure, with the three electrodes in each set paired with each other as AB and BA pairs. The subject indicated which of the two stimuli had the higher pitch. Random variation in current level was used to remove any loudness cues. The average electrode impedance was 38.6% lower for dual electrodes compared with single electrodes. Three subjects were able to successfully rank the three electrodes in each set in the expected tonotopic order for all seven sets of electrodes along the array. Three other subjects were able to rank sets of electrodes in the tonotopic order for most of the tested positions on the array. The remaining two subjects gave more variable pitch ranking across positions along the array, although successful tonotopic ranking was demonstrated for several sets of electrodes. Dual electrode stimulation with the CI24RE receiver-stimulator produced systematically lower electrode impedances and was capable of producing pitch percepts that were intermediate to those produced by the corresponding adjacent single electrodes. This makes available up to 43 channels of stimulation from 22 single electrodes.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant systemCochlear Implants International, 2002
- Electrode Discrimination by Early-Deafened Subjects Using the Cochlear Limited Multiple-Electrode Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 2000
- Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategiesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Electrode ranking of ‘‘place pitch’’ and speech recognition in electrical hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochleaThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesisThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Speech-Discrimination Scores Modeled as a Binomial VariableJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1978
- Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone ThresholdsJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1959