Hedge Funds and the Technology Bubble
Preprint
- 1 June 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The efficient markets hypothesis is based on the presumption that rational speculators would find it optimal to attack price bubbles and thus exert a correcting force on prices. We examine stock holdings of hedge funds during the time of the Technology Bubble on NASDAQ and find that the portfolios of these sophisticated investors were heavily tilted towards (overpriced) technology stocks. This does not seem to be the result of unawareness of the bubble: At an individual stock level, hedge funds reduced their exposure before prices collapsed, and their technology stock holdings outperformed characteristics-matched benchmarks. Our findings do not conform to the efficient markets view of rational speculation, but they are consistent with models in which rational investors can find it optimal to ride bubbles because of predictable investor sentiment and limits to arbitrage. Moreover, frictions such as short-sales constraints do not appear to be sufficient to explain why the presence of sophisticated investors failed to contain the bubble.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hedge Funds with StyleThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 2003
- Synchronization risk and delayed arbitragePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- IPO allocations: discriminatory or discretionary?Journal of Financial Economics, 2002
- Limited arbitrage in mergers and acquisitionsJournal of Financial Economics, 2002
- Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock‐Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and ExpensesThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Hedge Funds and the Asian Currency CrisisThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 2000
- The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk, Return, and IncentivesThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Asset allocationThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 1992
- Price Destabilizing SpeculationJournal of Political Economy, 1986