Long-Term Follow-up after Tight Control of Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes
Top Cited Papers
- 9 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 359 (15) , 1565-1576
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0806359
Abstract
Post-trial monitoring of patients in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) examined whether risk reductions for microvascular and macrovascular disease, achieved with the use of improved blood-pressure control during the trial, would be sustained. Among 5102 UKPDS patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus, we randomly assigned, over a 4-year period beginning in 1987, 1148 patients with hypertension to tight or less-tight blood-pressure control regimens. The 884 patients who underwent post-trial monitoring were asked to attend annual UKPDS clinics for the first 5 years, but no attempt was made to maintain their previously assigned therapies. Annual questionnaires completed by patients and general practitioners were used to follow patients who were unable to attend the clinic in years 1 through 5, and questionnaires were used for all patients in years 6 to 10. Seven prespecified aggregate clinical end points were examined on an intention-to-treat basis, according to the previous randomization categories. Differences in blood pressure between the two groups during the trial disappeared within 2 years after termination of the trial. Significant relative risk reductions found during the trial for any diabetes-related end point, diabetes-related death, microvascular disease, and stroke in the group receiving tight, as compared with less tight, blood-pressure control were not sustained during the post-trial follow-up. No risk reductions were seen during or after the trial for myocardial infarction or death from any cause, but a risk reduction for peripheral vascular disease associated with tight blood-pressure control became significant (P=0.02). The benefits of previously improved blood-pressure control were not sustained when between-group differences in blood pressure were lost. Early improvement in blood-pressure control in patients with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension was associated with a reduced risk of complications, but it appears that good blood-pressure control must be continued if the benefits are to be maintained. (UKPDS 81; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN75451837.)This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effect of a Multifactorial Intervention on Mortality in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39BMJ, 1998
- Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38BMJ, 1998
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- The Effect of Nisoldipine as Compared with Enalapril on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes and HypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) XI: Biochemical Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Diagnosis Compared with Age‐matched Normal SubjectsDiabetic Medicine, 1994
- UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS)Diabetologia, 1991
- EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy, 1990