Third-Party Participation in Wars
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 35 (4) , 659-677
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035004005
Abstract
This article investigates the calculus of third-party participation in ongoing wars. Altfeld and Bueno de Mesquita have shown that under an expected utility model of third-party participation, the probability of a nation's joining is in inverse proportion to the ex ante probability of other nations' joining. In seeming contradiction Yamamoto and Bremer have argued that one major power's decision to enter a war increases the probability that other powers will do likewise. In this article it is shown that these two perspectives, in fact, do not contradict one another. It is found that a nation is more likely to join a war when the initial belligerents in the conflict have few formal alliances, and when, despite ex ante beliefs, many other nations have already joined in the war. It is also shown that a third party is more likely to join the war in support of a friend than in opposition to a foe.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conflict Resolution and PeaceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Reason and WarAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Toward a Scientific Understanding of International Conflict: A Personal ViewInternational Studies Quarterly, 1985
- The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 1985
- Choosing Sides in WarsInternational Studies Quarterly, 1979
- Measuring Systemic PolarityJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1975
- A structural analysis of the situation in the Middle East in 1956Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1961
- Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory.Psychological Review, 1956
- An approach to the study of communicative acts.Psychological Review, 1953
- Attitudes and Cognitive OrganizationThe Journal of Psychology, 1946