Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: A royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Drug Targeting
- Vol. 15 (7-8) , 457-464
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860701539584
Abstract
Over the past two decades cancer has ascended the causes of human death to be number one or two in many nations world wide. A major limitation inherent to most conventional anticancer chemotherapeutic agents is their lack of tumor selectivity. One way to achieve selective drug targeting to solid tumors is to exploit abnormalities of tumor vasculature, namely, hypervascularisation; aberrant vascular architecture; extensive production of vascular permeability factors stimulating extravasation within tumor tissues; and lack of lymphatic drainage. Maeda and his colleagues have extensively studied tumor vascular abnormalities in terms of active and selective delivery of anticancer drugs to tumor tissues, notably defining the enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors. Due to their large molecular size, nanosized macromolecular anticancer drugs administered intravenously (i.v.) escape renal clearance. Often they can not penetrate the tight endothelial junctions of normal blood vessels, but they can extravasate in tumour vasculature and become trapped in the tumor vicinity. With time the tumor concentration will build up reaching several folds higher than that of the plasma due to lack of efficient lymphatic drainage in solid tumor; an ideal application for EPR-based selective anticancer drug delivery. Establishing this principle hastened development of various polymer conjugates and polymeric micelles as well as multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Indeed this selective high local concentration of nanosized anticancer drugs in tumor tissues has proven superior in therapeutic effect with minimal side effects in both preclinical and clinical settings. In this review the mechanisms and factors involved in the EPR effect, as well as the uniqueness of nanoscale drugs for tumor targeting through EPR effect, will be discussed in detail.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tumor Vascular Permeabilization by Vascular-Targeting Photosensitization: Effects, Mechanism, and Therapeutic ImplicationsClinical Cancer Research, 2006
- Biphasic effect of hydrogen peroxide on skeletal muscle arteriolar tone via activation of endothelial and smooth muscle signaling pathwaysJournal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Comparison of IgG diffusion and extracellular matrix composition in rhabdomyosarcomas grown in mice versus in vitro as spheroids reveals the role of host stromal cellsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: Metamorphosis of an Old Drug into a New Form of ChemotherapyCancer Investigation, 2001
- Polymer conjugates for tumour targeting and intracytoplasmic delivery. The EPR effect as a common gateway?Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 1999
- Photodynamic TherapyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Polyethylenglykol-umhülltes (pegyliertes) liposomales DoxorubicinDrugs, 1997
- Vascular Effects of Photodynamic TherapyJournal of Clinical Laser Medicine & Surgery, 1996
- Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other diseaseNature Medicine, 1995
- Transplacental Carcinogenesis by StilbestrolNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971