Comparison of common mobile‐phase volume markers with polar‐group‐containing reversed‐phase stationary phases

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A systematic study of the behavior of several common mobile‐phase volume markers using traditional and polar‐group‐containing reversed‐phase stationary phases is presented. Examined mobile‐phase volume markers include two neutral molecules, uracil and thiourea, concentrated (0.10 M) and dilute (0.0001 M) KNO3, and D2O. Mobile‐phase volumes are examined over the entire reversed‐phase mobile‐phase range of 100% water to 100% methanol or acetonitrile. The behavior of these mobile‐phase volume markers is compared with a maximum theoretical value (i.e. the void volume), as determined by pycnometry. The data suggest that: (i) uracil begins to fail as a mobile‐phase volume marker in mobile phases below about 40% strong solvent for polar group containing phases; (ii) in nearly all cases, the mobile‐phase volume measured dynamically is smaller than the pycnometric void volume; (iii) a significant dependence of measured mobile‐phase volume on salt concentration is seen on the polar endcapped phase, which is not observed on the traditional and embedded polar group phase; and (iv) D2O does not work well as a mobile‐phase volume marker with polar‐group‐containing phases, possibly due to interaction with the stationary phase polar group.

This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit: