The association of blood lead level and cancer mortality among whites in the United States.
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Environmental Health Perspectives in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 110 (4) , 325-329
- https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110325
Abstract
Lead is classified as a possible carcinogen in humans. We studied the relationship of blood lead level and all cancer mortality in the general population of the United States using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II (NHANES II) Mortality Study, 1992, consisting of a total of 203 cancer deaths (117 men and 86 women) among 3,592 whites (1,702 men and 1,890 women) with average of 13.3 years of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the dose-response relationship between blood lead and all cancer mortality. Log-transformed blood lead was either categorized into quartiles or treated as a continuous variable in a cubic regression spline. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated for site-specific cancers by categorizing lead above and below the median. Among men and women combined, dose-response relationship between quartile of blood lead and all cancer mortality was not significant (ptrend = 0.16), with RRs of 1.24 [95% percent confidence interval (CI), 0.66-2.33], 1.33 (95% CI, 0.57-3.09), and 1.50 (95% CI, 0.75-3.01) for the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively, compared with the first quartile. Spline analyses found no dose response (p = 0.29), and none of the site-specific cancer RRs were significant. Among men, no significant dose-response relationships were found for quartile or spline analyses (p trend = 0.57 and p = 0.38, respectively). Among women, no dose-response relationship was found for quartile analysis (ptrend = 0.22). However, the spline dose-response results were significant (p = 0.001), showing a threshold effect at the 94th percentile of blood lead or a lead concentration of 24 microg/dL, with an RR of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.2) compared with the risk at 12.5 percentile. Because the dose-response relationship found in women was not found in men, occurred at only the highest levels of lead, and has no clear biologic explanation, further replication of this relationship is needed before it can be considered believable. In conclusion, individuals with blood lead levels in the range of NHANES II do not appear to have increased risk of cancer mortality.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer statistics, 2000CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2000
- Exposure of the U.S. population to lead, 1991-1994.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998
- Time-to-Event Analysis of Longitudinal Follow-up of a Survey: Choice of the Time-scaleAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Cancer and occupational exposure to inorganic lead compounds: a meta-analysis of published data.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1995
- The decline in blood lead levels in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES)JAMA, 1994
- The mortality of lead smelter workers: an update.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Flexible regression models with cubic splinesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- The relationship of blood lead levels to blood pressure in the U.S. population.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1988
- Chronological Trend in Blood Lead Levels between 1976 and 1980New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- National Estimates of Blood Lead Levels: United States, 1976–1980New England Journal of Medicine, 1982