The Myth and Destructiveness of Equal Opportunities: The Continued Dominance of the Mothering Role
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Personnel Review
- Vol. 21 (4) , 37-47
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000000808
Abstract
Uses data from a questionnaire given to 66 mothers of young children (a cross‐section) to examine the relation between women’s expectations and actual experience as they enter the job market in increasing numbers and the idea of equal opportunities. The majority of women undertook a greater share of childcare than their partner irrespective of whether they worked and a majority wanted more responsibility. Suggests that the rhetoric of equal opportunities may actually worsen the situation for women, who because of deepseated attitudes about their mothering role, strive to fulfil a dual role – and give a lower priority and less time to work than is expected of them.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Interdisciplinary Approach to Analyzing the Managerial Gender GapHuman Relations, 1991
- The Effects of Dual Career Participation on Men: Some Determinants of Variation in Career and Personal SatisfactionHuman Relations, 1990
- Patterns of Sex Desegregation in Managerial and Professional Specialty Fields, 1950-1980Work and Occupations, 1990
- Family Ties: Balancing Commitments to Work and Family in Dual Earner HouseholdsAmerican Sociological Review, 1989
- Attitudes of European Working WomenLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 1982