Perceptions of Punishment: Inmates and Staff Rank the Severity of Prison Versus Intermediate Sanctions
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Prison Journal
- Vol. 74 (3) , 306-328
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0032855594074003003
Abstract
Proponents of the newer intermediate sanctions argue that there are “equivalencies” of punishment between community-based and prison sentences and that, at some level of intensity, community-based programs have roughly the same punitive “bite.” There is little research, however, on the relative severity of intensive supervision in comparison to other sanctions. This study was designed to examine how offenders and staff in Minnesota rank the severity of various criminal sanctions and which particular sanctions they judge equivalent in punitiveness. In addition, we explored how both groups rank the difficulty of commonly imposed probation conditions and which offender background characteristics are associated with perceptions of sanction severity. Our results suggest that there are intermediate sanctions that equate, in terms of punitiveness, with prison. For example, inmates viewed 1 year in prison as “equivalent” in severity to 3 years of intensive probation supervision or 1 year in jail, and they viewed 6 months in jail as equivalent to 1 year of intensive supervision. Although inmates and staff ranked most sanctions similarly, the staff ratings were higher for 3 and 6 months in jail and lower for 1 and 5 years probation. The two groups also differed on the difficulty of complying with individual probation conditions: Staff judged most probation conditions as harder for offenders to comply with than did inmates. Our results provide empirical evidence to support what many have suggested: It is no longer necessary to equate criminal punishment solely with prison. At some level of intensity and length, intensive probation is equally severe as prison and may actually be the more dreaded penalty. The results should give policymakers and justice officials pause, particularly those who suggest they are imprisoning such a large number of offenders—not to use prisons' ability to incapacitate and rehabilitate—but rather to get “tough on crime.”Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research Note: The Role of Differential Experience with the Criminal Justice System in Changes in Perceptions of Severity of Legal Sanctions Over TimeCrime & Delinquency, 1993
- Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probationJustice Quarterly, 1993
- The New Intensive Supervision MovementCrime & Delinquency, 1990
- Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment Seriousness: Patterns of individual differencesJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1985
- The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity of PunishmentSocial Forces, 1980
- On the Perceived Severity of Legal PenaltiesThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1979
- The Ratio Measurement of Social Status: Some Cross-Cultural ComparisonsSocial Forces, 1972
- On the possible psychophysical laws.Psychological Review, 1959
- The Direct Estimation of Sensory Magnitudes: LoudnessThe American Journal of Psychology, 1956
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927