Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Quantum Zeno effect’’’
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 43 (9) , 5168-5169
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.43.5168
Abstract
Various interpretations of quantum mechanics are valid insofar as they predict the same experimental results. Some invoke ‘‘wave-function collapse’’ and some do not. An interpretation based on the collapse postulate provides a simple explanation for a recent experimental demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect [Itano et al., Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)], but other interpretations are also valid.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on ‘‘Quantum Zeno effect’’Physical Review A, 1991
- Incomplete ‘‘collapse’’ and partial quantum Zeno effectPhysical Review A, 1990
- Quantum Zeno effectPhysical Review A, 1990
- Photoelectron waiting times and atomic state reduction in resonance fluorescencePhysical Review A, 1989
- Wave-function collapse due to null measurements: The origin of intermittent atomic fluorescencePhysical Review A, 1987
- The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1970
- "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1957