What can mendelian randomisation tell us about modifiable behavioural and environmental exposures?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 May 2005
- Vol. 330 (7499) , 1076-1079
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1076
Abstract
Epidemiologists look for modifiable causes of common diseases to improve population health. However, epidemiological studies may identify spurious “causes.” For example, the epidemiological findings that hormone replacement therapy protects against coronary heart disease,w1β carotene prevents lung cancer,w2and vitamin E and vitamin C reduce risk of cardiovascular diseasew3have all been refuted by randomised controlled trials and have raised concerns about the value of epidemiological studies.1 The misleading findings were probably due to confounding by behavioural, physiological, and socioeconomic factors related both to exposures and to disease end points.2 3 One solution to these problems is mendelian randomisation.4 5Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism (C677T), hyperhomocysteinemia, and risk of ischemic cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism: prospective and case-control studies from the Copenhagen City Heart StudyBlood, 2004
- Commentary: The hormone replacement-coronary heart disease conundrum: is this the death of observational epidemiology?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?Published by Elsevier ,2004
- Fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease: does Mendelian randomization suggest the associations are non-causal?QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Commentary: Development of Mendelian randomization: from hypothesis test to 'Mendelian deconfounding'International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Commentary: Katan's remarkable foresight: genes and causality 18 years onInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Commentary: Mendelian randomization and gene-environment interactionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Mendelian randomisation: a new spin or real progress?The Lancet, 2003
- 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Variants and Congenital Anomalies: A HuGE ReviewAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000