Communication of findings in pharmacovigilance: use of the term “signal” and the need for precision in its use
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 61 (5-6) , 479-480
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-005-0951-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postmarketing surveillance of potentially fatal reactions to oncology drugs: potential utility of two signal-detection algorithmsEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Comparison of data mining methodologies using Japanese spontaneous reportsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2004
- Identification and evaluation of a possible signal of exacerbation of colitis during rofecoxib treatment, using Prescription-Event Monitoring dataJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2004
- Adverse drug reaction teaching in UK undergraduate medical and pharmacy programmesJournal of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, 2004
- Assessing the Impact of Drug Safety Signals from the WHO Database Presented in ???SIGNAL???Drug Safety, 2003
- Principles of Signal Detection in PharmacovigilanceDrug Safety, 1997
- False‐positives in spontaneous reporting: should we worry about them?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994