New Intrauterine Growth Curves Based on United States Data
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 125 (2) , e214-e224
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0913
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create and validate new intrauterine weight, length, and head circumference growth curves using a contemporary, large, racially diverse US sample and compare with the Lubchenco curves.METHODS: Data on 391 681 infants (Pediatrix Medical Group) aged 22 to 42 weeks at birth from 248 hospitals within 33 US states (1998–2006) for birth weight, length, head circumference, estimated gestational age, gender, and race were used. Separate subsamples were used to create and validate curves. Smoothed percentile curves (3rd to 97th) were created by the Lambda Mu Sigma (LMS) method. The validation sample was used to confirm representativeness of the curves. The new curves were compared with the Lubchenco curves.RESULTS: Final sample included 257 855 singleton infants (57.2% male) who survived to discharge. Gender-specific weight-, length-, and head circumference-for-age curves were created (n = 130 111) and successfully validated (n = 127 744). Small-for-gestational age and large-for-gestational age classifications using the Lubchenco curves differed significantly from the new curves for each gestational age (all P < .0001). The Lubchenco curves underestimated the percentage of infants who were small-for-gestational-age except for younger girls (≤36 weeks), for whom it was more likely to be overestimated; underestimated percentage of infants (≤36 weeks) who were large-for-gestational-age; and overestimated percentage of infants (>36 weeks) who were large-for-gestational-age.CONCLUSIONS: The Lubchenco curves may not represent the current US population. The new intrauterine growth curves created and validated in this study, based on a contemporary, large, racially diverse US sample, provide clinicians with an updated tool for growth assessment in US NICUs. Research into the ability of the new definitions of small-for-gestational-age and large-for-gestational-age to identify high-risk infants in terms of short-term and long-term health outcomes is needed.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a Body Proportionality Index for Growth Assessment of Preterm InfantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2008
- Continuous growth reference from 24thweek of gestation to 24 months by genderBMC Pediatrics, 2008
- Centile charts for birthweight for gestational age for Scottish singleton birthsBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008
- Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2007
- Equations describing percentiles for birth weight, head circumference, and length of preterm infantsJournal of Perinatology, 2006
- Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihoodStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Growth status and growth rates of a varied sample of low birth weight, preterm infants: A longitudinal cohort from birth to three years of ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Growth graphs for the clinical assesment of infants of varying gestational ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1976
- Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeksPublished by Elsevier ,1969
- A grid for recording the weight of premature infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1948