The new genetics: Psychological responses to genetic testing
- 28 February 1998
- Vol. 316 (7132) , 693-696
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7132.693
Abstract
This is the second of four articles discussing the broader implications of advances in genetics Predicting disease on the basis of biological markers, such as serum cholesterol concentration or blood pressure, is not new; the ability to predict disease using DNA is. As the scope for genetic testing extends beyond testing for single gene disorders to testing large sections of the population for genes associated with common disorders it is important to consider what effect this will have on individuals and on society as a whole. Research into the psychological impact of genetic testing in Huntington's disease, cystic fibrosis, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer has shown that an individual's decision to undergo testing and his or her response on receiving the results are influenced by many factors. This article discusses the nature of these factors and the implication they have for the introduction of widespread genetic screening. #### Summary points As genetic screening becomes widespread, its psychological impact on individuals, their families, and society as a whole needs to be assessed The psychological impact of predictive genetic testing for Huntington's disease, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer, when offered with expert counselling before and after testing, depends more on pretest expectations, mood, and social support than the results of the test itself Distress associated with screening may be reduced by careful assessment before and after testing, counselling, and support Research is needed to determine the most effective and practical counselling strategies for the increasingly large number of people who will be offered genetic tests for treatable conditions The psychological impact of screening for biological markers associated with increased risk of disease has been well researched.1 Extrapolating from these findings to predict the impact of population based genetic screening of asymptomatic individuals is difficult, though—partly because the predictive value of genetic tests for some …Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatment: Effects on smoking-related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change.Health Psychology, 1997
- Objective standards are not enough: Affective, self-evaluative, and behavioral responses to social comparison information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Long-term cognitive and emotional impact of genetic testing for carriers of cystic fibrosis: The effects of test result and gender.Health Psychology, 1997
- Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings.Health Psychology, 1997
- A guide to constructs of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996
- Attributions for disability: The influence of genetic screeningSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- On attitudes and appreciation 6 months after predictive DNA testing for huntington disease in the Dutch programAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1993
- Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis through primary health care services.BMJ, 1991
- Testing for Huntington's disease with support for all partiesThe Lancet, 1990
- Screening for Down's syndrome.BMJ, 1988