Postoperative Symptoms Following LLETZ or Radical Cervical Diathermy with Fulgaration: A Randomized Double‐Blinded Prospective Study
- 1 May 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 179-181
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03281.x
Abstract
Fifty-five patients were randomized in a double-blinded manner to large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) (29 patients) or radical cervical diathermy with fulgaration (RCDF) (26 patients) for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Patients completed a 2-month diary of symptoms and completed a 10-week postoperative questionnaire. White vaginal discharge lasted 7.3 (4.6) days (SD) for RCDF compared to 3.4 (1.6) days (SD) for LLETZ. There was no significant difference in any other symptoms on analysis This appears to be the first report clearly assessing the length and severity of postoperative symptoms following LLETZ or RCDF. There is no reason on length and severity of postoperative symptoms to choose 1 of these 2 treatment methods over the other.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: a superior mode of treatmentBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smearBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Tissue Destruction Following Cold Coagulation of the CervixJournal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1988
- The treatment of grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with cryotherapy: An 11-year experienceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Principles and resultsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983