Are User Runtime Estimates Inherently Inaccurate?
- 1 January 2005
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 253-263
- https://doi.org/10.1007/11407522_14
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comprehensive model of the supercomputer workloadPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2005
- Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- The Impact of More Accurate Requested Runtimes on Production Job Scheduling PerformancePublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Scheduling Jobs on Parallel Systems Using a Relaxed Backfill StrategyPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Multiple-Queue Backfilling Scheduling with Priorities and Reservations for Parallel SystemsPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Utilization, predictability, workloads, and user runtime estimates in scheduling the IBM SP2 with backfillingIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2001
- Randomization, Speculation, and Adaptation in Batch SchedulersPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2000
- Scheduling for Parallel Supercomputing: A Historical Perspective of Achievable UtilizationPublished by Springer Nature ,1999
- Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- A microeconomic scheduler for parallel computersPublished by Springer Nature ,1995