Role of glycopeptide antibiotics in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 76 (s2) , 54-56
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb07938.x
Abstract
The exact timing of the introduction of the glycopeptide antibiotics teicoplanin and vancomycin in the management of the febrile neutropenic patient continues to be controversial. However, there are certain firm criteria now emerging. Bacteraemia can be eradicated with a success rate approaching 100% in cases where the organism can be identified and shown to be sensitive. Approximately 65% of cases of soft-tissue infection, usually occurring with the use of a Hickman or equivalent indwelling catheter, are associated with the presence on culture of Gram-positive organisms of presumed skin origin. Such infection is an indication for the early use of antibiotics with proven activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci and diptheroids. Resolution of fever in up to 50% of cases may result from using 'planned progressive therapy': the introduction of specific Gram-positive cover in patients who have failed to respond at 48-72 h to regimens such as a ureidopenicillin or a third-generation cephalosporin with or without an aminoglycoside. This approach reduces the number of patients who go on to receive empirical amphotericin B intravenously for presumed fungal infection. Using teicoplanin or vancomycin as first-line agents in the empirical treatment of first fever in febrile neutropenic patients is perhaps more controversial. Recent developments which include using quinolone-based prophylaxis more widely and introducing cytokines to reduce the period of neutropenia may increase the likelihood that a neutropenic patient's febrile episode will be due to a Gram-positive organism. The dilemma of choosing broad-spectrum monotherapy or targeted combination therapy in the situation remains unresolved. Current studies, however, should help to clarify this situation. Finally, other current studies of teicoplanin and vancomycin as prophylactic agents administered either orally or systemically, may provide additional indications for their use in the neutropenic patient.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-blind placebo controlled study of vancomycin prophylaxis for central venous catheter insertion in cancer patientsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1990
- Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman cathetersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1989
- Teicoplanin adminstration in patients experiencing reactions to vancomycinJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1989
- Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal BacteremiaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- Activity of teicoplanin against Gram-negative anaerobesJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1988
- The effect of medium and inoculum on the actirity of vancomycin and teicoplanin against coagulase-negative staphylococciJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1987
- Use of teicoplanin for Hickman catheter associated staphylococcal infection in immunosuppressed patientsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1987
- TEICOPLANIN-RESISTANT COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUSThe Lancet, 1986
- Ciprofloxacin for Selective Decontamination of the Alimentary Tract in Patients with Acute Leukemia During Remission Induction Treatment: The Effect on Fecal FloraThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1985
- In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplaninAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1984