The Identification of High-Risk Children: A Retrospective Look at Selection Criteria
- 1 May 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 8 (5) , 27-31
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947500800503
Abstract
Three-hundred kindergarten children were screened with a test battery in order to identify high-risk children. The main principle underlying the selection criteria was Myklebust's definition of a learning disability as a discrepancy between achievement (as measured by a readiness test and knowledge of letter names) and potential. Other selection criteria were a discrepancy between verbal and nonverbal ability, intratest scatter, and performance on a visual-motor copying test. Sixty-two children were selected as having probable learning disabilities. At the beginning of first grade, they were tested with the WISC and the ITPA and showed average abilities. At the end of first grade these "high-risk" children scored within the average range on the Metropolitan Achievement Test. It was concluded that the selection criteria in kindergarten were inadequate.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some Predictive Antecedents of Specific Reading DisabilityJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1974
- Predicting Learning Disabilities from Kindergarten ReportsJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1973
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Four Methods of Instruction on the Achievement of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities1The Journal of Special Education, 1973
- Clinical-Diagnostic Use of the WPPSI in Predicting Learning Disabilities in Grade 1The Journal of Special Education, 1971
- Visuo-Motor Ability for School Prediction: A Seven-Year StudyPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1967
- Early Identification of Children with Learning DisabilitiesExceptional Children, 1967
- Evidence for a Hierarchical Arrangement of Learning ProcessesPublished by Elsevier ,1965
- The Relationship of First-Grade Readiness to Third- and Fourth-Grade AchievementThe Journal of Educational Research, 1962