Response to Comment on "Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression"
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 308 (5718) , 52
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108198
Abstract
Using the Hoffmann model (4), we concluded by sensitivity analysis (3) that RelA overexpression would minimally perturb the system; therefore, we used RelA localization as our principal output. We estimated that average overexpression of RelA fusion proteins was 3 to 5 times that of endogenous RelA levels in transfected cells, with a distribution in the cell population. Using simulations, Barken et al. (5) suggest that RelA, IκBα, or RelA and IκBα expression (within the range suggested by our data) maintains oscillations but alters oscillation frequency and amplitude. They suggest [figure 1 in (5)], that simulated 4-fold overexpression of RelA delays the second peak of nuclear localization by 3.5 hours (normal 2-hour peak delayed to 5.5 hours). This does not fit our experimental data, because in both cell lines used, the second peak of nuclear localization with RelA overexpression alone was at around 3 hours [see figure 1 and supplemental material in (1)]. Reanalysis of our data from SK-N-AS cells (Fig. 1) and HeLa and Swiss 3T3 cells (data not shown) demonstrates no correlation between RelA-DsRed expression level and successive peak timing (also of amplitude, not shown) with cellular fluorescent levels that vary up to ∼20 fold. This clear inconsistency between their in silico results and our experimental data suggests that their computational model cannot faithfully reproduce all aspects of the system. Altering the computational model (1, 4) by replacing the second-order term for NF-κB–induced IκBα synthesis with a linear expression [reaction 28 in table S1 in (1)] results in a new model that reproduces all of the fundamental characteristics of our experimental data. This model shows much reduced sensitivity of period to RelA concentration (Fig. 2), which demonstrates that continued refinement of the Hoffmann model (6, 7) may well bring the simulations closer to observed biological phenomena.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on "Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression"Science, 2005
- The Strength of Indecisiveness: Oscillatory Behavior for Better Cell Fate DeterminationScience's STKE, 2004
- Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene ExpressionScience, 2004
- In Silico Simulation of Inhibitor Drug Effects on Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway DynamicsMolecular Pharmacology, 2004
- Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κBMolecular Cell, 2004
- Mathematical model of NF-κB regulatory moduleJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2004
- Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cellsNature Genetics, 2004
- NF-κB signalling is inhibited by glucocorticoid receptor and STAT6 via distinct mechanismsJournal of Cell Science, 2003
- The IκB-NF-κB Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene ActivationScience, 2002
- Constitutive NF-kappa B activation, enhanced granulopoiesis, and neonatal lethality in I kappa B alpha-deficient mice.Genes & Development, 1995