Validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with gout
Open Access
- 25 April 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 59 (5) , 665-669
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23575
Abstract
Objective To assess the psychometric properties of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) in patients with gout. Methods This study was conducted in a multicenter cohort of patients with gout whose data were collected at baseline (time 0) and 6 months later (time 6). Reliability was assessed by test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient). Construct validity was assessed with convergent validity (HAQ DI correlation with Short Form 36 [SF‐36]) and discriminative validity (HAQ DI correlation with clinical features). Sensitivity to change was determined by comparing HAQ DI time 0 versus HAQ DI time 6 (percentage of change, effect size, smallest real difference [SRD], and Guyatt's responsiveness index [GRI]). Results We included 206 patients (96.6% men, mean ± SD age and disease duration 56.3 ± 12.4 years and 9.3 ± 8.5 years, respectively). Of these, 52.4% had joint pain, 22.8% swelling, 32.5% reduced joint mobility, and 36.9% tophi. The mean HAQ DI score was 0.59 ± 0.77 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.49–0.70). ICC (n = 36, evaluations at baseline and 5 days later) was 0.76. Cronbach's alphas were 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.92, P = 0.000) for the 20 HAQ DI items and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92–0.94, P = 0.000) for the 8 HAQ DI categories. The HAQ DI correlated in predictable ways with SF‐36 subscales and clinical variables, and discriminated between subgroups with and without any joint pain, swelling, and tophi. Concerning sensitivity to change (n = 167), the difference between HAQ DI time 0 and HAQ DI time 6 was 0.31 ± 0.58 (effect size 0.62, SRD 0.59, and GRI 1.91). ΔHAQ DI correlated with Δpain (r = 0.349, P = 0.000). Conclusion The HAQ DI is a valid and reliable measure of functioning in patients with gout.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: A revised version of the health assessment questionnaireArthritis & Rheumatism, 2004
- Hacia una base normativa mexicana en la medición de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, mediante el Formato Corto 36Salud Pública de México, 2004
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Erratum: Carol Dukes Hamilton. Tuberculosis in the Cytokine Era: What Rheumatologists Need to Know, Arthritis & Rheumatism (2003) 48(8) 2085–2091Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2004
- GoutJAMA, 2003
- The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: Dimensions and Practical ApplicationsHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003
- Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsivenessQuality of Life Research, 2001
- Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change ScoresPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1996
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary goutArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977