Win, Lose, or Draw: Predicting the Outcome of Civil Wars
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 52 (2) , 239-268
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200201
Abstract
What characteristics of a civil war determine whether it will end in a government victory, a rebel victory, or a negotiated settlement? To explore this question we present an expected utility model of the choice rebels and governments face between accepting a settlement or continuing to fight. The model implies that a settlement becomes more likely as (1) estimates of the probability of victory decline; (2) costs of conflict increase; (3) estimates of the time required to win increase; or (4) the utility from a settlement increases relative to that of victory. Factors that (1) increase one party's probability of victory; (2) increase its payoffs from victory; (3) reduce the costs of conflict; and/or (4) reduce the time required to achieve victory increase that party's probability of winning and decrease the likelihood of a settlement. We test these propositions with a multinomial choice model that correctly predicts the outcome in 86 percent of the cases.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Declining Advantages of DemocracyJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1998
- How Civil Wars EndJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1996
- The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985American Political Science Review, 1996
- Insurgency, counterinsurgency, and the rational peasantPublic Choice, 1996
- The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993American Political Science Review, 1995
- The Rebel's DilemmaPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1995
- Logistic RegressionPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- The PeacemakersPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Nonelite Response to State-Sanctioned TerrorThe Western Political Quarterly, 1989
- The Political Economy of Death Squads: Toward a Theory of the Impact of State-Sanctioned TerrorInternational Studies Quarterly, 1989