Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 August 2012
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 13 (1) , 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132
Abstract
The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare directly the effects of different interventions in ways that minimize bias. If the findings are to influence policy and practice then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set, which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area. Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for general guidance on the development of core outcome sets. Key issues to consider in the development of a core outcome set include its scope, the stakeholder groups to involve, choice of consensus method and the achievement of a consensus.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Reporting Clinical Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic ReviewJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- What outcomes from pharmacologic treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core setArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: Contributions from clinician and patient delphi exercisesArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatologyTrials, 2007
- Patient perspective: reasons and methods for measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.2007
- Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendationsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2003
- Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6.2003