Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture: a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 69 (818) , 109-113
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-109
Abstract
59 patients with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fracture, but negative radiographs at presentation and review, were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS). The diagnoses were compared with subsequent follow-up. There were four scaphoid fractures, 10 other fractures and three significant ligamentous injuries. All scaphoid fractures were identified by MRI and BS. MRI showed better interobserver agreement for scaphoid injury than BS and fewer false positive reports. Significant ligamentous injury and carpal instability diagnosed by MRI were not evident on scintigraphy. Using fast scanning protocols, the cost of MRI is comparable with that of BS. MRI should be considered as the appropriate second line investigation in these clinical circumstances.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Scaphoid FracturesJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1992
- Application of magnetic resonance imaging to ischemic necrosis of the lunateThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1989
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Musculoskeletal InjuriesRadiologic Clinics of North America, 1989
- Bone abnormalities of the knee: prevalence and significance at MR imaging.Radiology, 1989
- MRI demonstration of radiographically occult fractures: what have we been missing?RadioGraphics, 1989
- Musculo-skeletal magnetic resonance imaging using inversion recovery pulse sequences at 0.08 TClinical Radiology, 1988
- Bone Scanning of Fractures of the ScaphoidJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1984
- Bone scanning in the assessment of fractures of the scaphoidThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1979