Putting Ideas in Their Place: A Response to “Learning and Change in the British Columbia Forest Policy Sector”
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Canadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique
- Vol. 29 (1) , 135-144
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900007277
Abstract
Ken Lertzman, Jeremy Rayner and Jeremy Wilson provide an idea-based approach to explaining changes in British Columbia's forest policy by applying the concept of learning developed by Paul Sabatier as part of his “advocacy coalition framework.” This effort to highlight the importance of ideas and learning is a welcome development in Canadian policy studies. But a word of caution is in order as well, because the article has some indications of slipping into a disconcerting pattern in the development of our discipline. For periods of time we seem to single out one significant variable and pay an inordinate amount of attention to it, the most striking examples being interest groups in the 1950s and 1960s and institutions in the 1980s. As we seize upon the new variable, we discredit the previous generation of scholars who we claim (sometimes misleadingly) ignored it.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- It's Not Easy Being Green: The Politics of Canada's Green PlanCanadian Public Policy, 1994
- Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in BritainComparative Politics, 1993
- Ideas and Foreign PolicyPublished by Cornell University Press ,1993
- The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy changePolicy Sciences, 1992
- Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordinationInternational Organization, 1992
- Paradigms and Political Discourse: Protective Legislation in France and the United States Before 1914Canadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique, 1989
- The Return to the StateAmerican Political Science Review, 1988