Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 43 (17) , 2559-2579
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.030
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Molecular Profiling Ready for Use in Clinical Decision Making?The Oncologist, 2007
- Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic EffectJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor StudiesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Missing covariate data within cancer prognostic studies: a review of current reporting and proposed guidelinesBritish Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Introduction: Tumor markers as clinical cancer tests—are we there yet?Seminars in Oncology, 2002
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variablesBMJ, 2001
- 2000 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1998
- Tumor Marker Utility Grading System: a Framework to Evaluate Clinical Utility of Tumor MarkersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncologyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994