Inter-observer Variation on Registration of Signals of Cancer
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
- Vol. 5 (3) , 133-139
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02813438709013993
Abstract
Previous studies have dealt with the role of seven warning signals of cancer in public health education and cancer diagnostics in general practice. Registrations of warning signals from medical records have some inconveniences common to most retrospective record studies. In the present inter-observer variation study it is found that agreement is good for warning signals in cancer patients when the warning signal has a probable connection with the disease. In control patients, and for more incidentally occurring warning signals in cancer patients, agreement is not so good. It seems that reproducible registrations from records are possible when there is a precise definition of what to look for and the data are relevant to the patient's disease. This study stresses the importance of good record keeping in medical practice.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Endoscopic Diagnosis of Duodenal Ulcer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Bias and of Interobserver VariationScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1986
- Variations in histopathological evaluation of nonneoplastic colonic mucosal abnormalities; assessment and clinical significanceHistopathology, 1985
- The Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric UlcerScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1985
- Inter‐observer variation in the histopathological reporting of Hodgkin's disease: an analysis of diagnostic subcomponents using kappa statisticsHistopathology, 1983
- An improved method of analysis of observer variation between pathologistsHistopathology, 1982
- Inter observer agreement in the assessment of the motor response of the Glasgow ‘coma’ scaleClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1978
- Medical Records That Guide and TeachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1968