How to interpret figures in reports of clinical trials
Open Access
- 22 May 2008
- Vol. 336 (7654) , 1166-1169
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39561.548924.94
Abstract
A picture may be worth a thousand words but in medical research, caution Stuart Pocock, Thomas Travison, and Lisa Wruck, it is important to understand exactly what you are looking atKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Figures in clinical trial reports: current practice & scope for improvementTrials, 2007
- Uterine-Artery Embolization versus Surgery for Symptomatic Uterine FibroidsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- From Submission to Publication: A Retrospective Review of the Tables and Figures in a Cohort of Randomized Controlled Trials Submitted to the British Medical JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Coronary Intervention for Persistent Occlusion after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk HerniationJAMA, 2006
- More medical journals should inform their contributors about three key principles of graph constructionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Effectiveness of community physiotherapy and enhanced pharmacy review for knee pain in people aged over 55 presenting to primary care: pragmatic randomised trialBMJ, 2006
- Effect of baseline serum albumin concentration on outcome of resuscitation with albumin or saline in patients in intensive care units: analysis of data from the saline versus albumin fluid evaluation (SAFE) studyBMJ, 2006
- Let's Practice What We PreachThe American Statistician, 2002