In Vitro Activity of Caspofungin Combined with Sulfamethoxazole against Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus spp
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 48 (9) , 3279-3283
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.9.3279-3283.2004
Abstract
Caspofungin (CAS) inhibits fungal cell wall synthesis. Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) inhibits folate biosynthesis and is active in vitro against Aspergillus spp. We studied the activities of the combination of CAS and SMX against 31 Aspergillus isolates and compared them with that of SMX combined with amphotericin B (AMB) or itraconazole (ITC). MICs and minimal effective concentrations (MECs) were determined by the NCCLS broth microdilution method. With MIC endpoints, the combination of SMX and CAS showed synergy or synergy to additivity against 29 of 31 isolates. With MEC endpoints, synergy to additivity was found against 12 of 31 isolates and indifference was displayed against the rest of them. SMX in combination with AMB or ITC was not truly synergistic, while synergy to additivity was found for SMX-AMB and SMX-ITC against 17 of 31 and 3 of 12 isolates, respectively. No antagonism was found with any of the drug combinations. Further analysis of the synergy of CAS and SMX was performed by detailed measurement of hyphal length by microscopy and time-dependent 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2 H -tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT)-based hyphal damage experiments. With MEC endpoints, the combination of CAS and SMX was characterized by a greater than 50% decrease in hyphal length compared to the hyphal lengths achieved with double the concentration of each drug alone. The XTT-based hyphal damage studies showed a statistically significant ( P < 0.05) reduction in viability with CAS and SMX in combination compared to the viabilities achieved with double the concentration of each drug alone. These findings support the synergy results found by using MIC endpoints and suggest that visual MEC measurements may not be sufficient to identify the synergistic interactions seen by more sensitive, quantitative methods. Animal models are required to validate the significance of the synergy of CAS and SMX against Aspergillus spp. observed in vitro.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Vitro Interaction of Caspofungin Acetate with Voriconazole against Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus sppAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Invasive Aspergillus infections in hematologic malignancy patientsSeminars in Respiratory Infections, 2002
- In Vitro Activities of Pentamidine, Pyrimethamine, Trimethoprim, and Sulfonamides against Aspergillus SpeciesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Folic acid antagonism of sulfa drug treatmentsTrends in Parasitology, 2002
- In Vitro Synergy of Caspofungin and Amphotericin B against Aspergillus and Fusarium sppAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Synergy, Pharmacodynamics, and Time-Sequenced Ultrastructural Changes of the Interaction between Nikkomycin Z and the Echinocandin FK463 against Aspergillus fumigatusAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Colorimetric Assay for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Aspergillus SpeciesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001
- Prevention of invasive aspergillosis in AIDS by sulfamethoxazoleAIDS, 2001
- Signature‐tagged and directed mutagenesis identify PABA synthetase as essential for Aspergillus fumigatus pathogenicityMolecular Microbiology, 2000
- Aspergillus fumigatusand AspergillosisClinical Microbiology Reviews, 1999