Behind Closed Doors
- 2 July 1987
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 317 (1) , 46-50
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198707023170110
Abstract
Hospital ethics committees have been hailed as providing a promising way to resolve ethical dilemmas in patient care. Although ethics committees may have various tasks, such as confirming prognoses, educating care givers, or developing hospital policies, their most innovative role is making recommendations in individual cases.1 2 3 4 5 This role has been supported by the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, the American Medical Association, and the American Hospital Association. Strictly speaking, such recommendations are not binding, but they undoubtedly carry great weight, especially if they are cogently justified.6 It is predicted that . . .Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case of Claire Conroy: Will Administrative Review Safeguard Incompetent Patients?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- The Bartling CaseJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1986
- Hospital Ethics CommitteesJAMA, 1985
- The Case for the CourtsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1984
- The Death of Clarence Herbert: Withdrawing Care Is Not MurderAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- The Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The Emergence of Institutional Ethics CommitteesLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1984
- A national survey of hospital ethics committeesCritical Care Medicine, 1983
- Patient-Physician Concordance in Problem Identification in the Primary Care SettingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978