Is Representation Rife?
- 13 May 2003
- Vol. 16 (2) , 107-123
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00210
Abstract
This paper applies a teleosemantic perspective to the question of whether there is genuine representation outside the familiar realm of belief‐desire psychology. I first explain how teleosemantics accounts for the representational powers of beliefs and desires themselves. I then ask whether biological states which are simpler than beliefs and desires can also have representational powers. My conclusion is that such biologically simple states can be ascribed representational contents, but only in a system‐relative way: such states must be ascribed varying contents when viewed as components in different biological systems. I conclude by arguing that ‘the genetic code’ does not even embody this kind of system‐relative representation.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Roots of ReasonPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2003
- Thinking about ConsciousnessPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2002
- The Status of Teleosemantics, or How to Stop Worrying about SwampmanAustralasian Journal of Philosophy, 2001
- Teleosemantics and indeterminacyAustralasian Journal of Philosophy, 1998
- Misrepresenting & malfunctioningPhilosophical Studies, 1995
- Success semanticsAnalysis, 1990
- VI—I and NowProceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 1989
- Representation and ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 1984
- Mental representationErkenntnis, 1978
- VI.—Symposium: “Facts and Propositions.”Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 1927