The Psychology of Good Judgment
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 16 (3) , 273-280
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9601600312
Abstract
Mind and environment evolve in tandem—almost a platitude. Much of judgment and decision making research, however, has compared cognition to standard statistical models, rather than to how well it is adapted to its environment. The author argues two points. First, cognitive algorithms are tuned to certain information formats, most likely to those that humans have encountered during their evolutionary history. In par ticular, Bayesian computations are simpler when the information is in a frequency format than when it is in a probability format. The author investigates whether fre quency formats can make physicians reason more often the Bayesian way. Second, cognitive algorithms need to operate under constraints of limited time, knowledge, and computational power, and they need to exploit the structures of their environments. The author describes a fast and frugal algorithm, Take The Best, that violates standard principles of rational inference but can be as accurate as sophisticated "optimal" mod els for diagnostic inference. Key words: Bayes' theorem; bounded rationality; infor mation format; probabilistic reasoning; satisficing; training; medical education. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:273-280)Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Psychological Review, 1996
- Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertaintyCognition, 1996
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review, 1995
- From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology.Psychological Review, 1991
- Experience and the base-rate fallacyOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1982
- Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and ChoiceAnnual Review of Psychology, 1981
- Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory ResultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973
- Analyzing the components of clinical inference.Psychological Review, 1964