On-line sorting of human chromosomes by centromeric index, and identification of sorted populations by GTG-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Using slit-scan flow cytometry, the shape of human metaphase chromosomes, as expressed in their centromeric index (CI), and the DNA content of the chromosomes have been used as parameters in bivariate flow karyotyping. The resolution of the DNA vs CI flow karyogram of the larger chromosomes up to chromosome 13 is much higher than the resolution obtained in the DNA-based monovariate flow karyogram. Chromosome length appears to be an important factor in the resolution of the DNA vs CI-based flow karyogram. A method has been developed to obtain chromosomes in suspension that are long enough for adequate analysis. Several chromosomes that cannot be distinguished or are difficult to discriminate in the DNA-based karyogram can now be distinguished as individual peaks, e.g., chromosomes 1 and 2. The peak of chromosomes 9–12 can be separated into two peaks formed by chromosomes 9 and 11, and 10 and 12, respectively. The advantage of the system applied in this study is that the DNA vs CI analysis is performed on-line, allowing chromosomes to be sorted on the bases of their CI. Pulse shapes of the selected chromosomes can be recorded simultaneously with the transmission of the sorting command. The purity of the sorted fraction can be estimated from the offline inspection of these pulse shapes. Fractions of chromosome 1 have been sorted out on the basis of the CI information, centrifuged on slides, fixed and subsequently banded with trypsin and Giemsa or hybridized with the chromosome 1 specific probe, pUC 1.77. The observed purity under the selected conditions ranges from 80%–99% and is in accordance with the estimates of the purities made on the basis of the simultaneously recorded pulse shapes. Fixation of the chromosome suspension prior to flow cytometric analysis and sorting appears to be essential for the preservation of their morphology and has no adverse influence on the resolution of Giemsa banding or on the quality of in situ hybridization.