The Effects of Visual Field Size on Hemispheric Asymmetry of Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 51 (1-2) , 141-151
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459009000517
Abstract
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in 17 females (10 right-handers and 7 left-handers) and 17 males (10 right-handers and 7 left-handers). The stimulus was a checkerboard pattern phase-reversed at a rate of 1 Hz, binocularly viewed by the subject. Two experimental conditions were tested: field size (the stimulus was enlarged from 1 to 30° of visual angle) and occlusion (the central part of the stimulus was occluded by experimental scotomata of various size—from 1 to 16°). Responses recorded at occipital and temporal leads of the two hemispheres were compared. The P100—N 145 amplitude was larger at occipital than at temporal leads, it augmented increasing the size of the stimulus and diminished occluding progressively larger portions of the central field. Hemispheric asymmetries emerged with large field sizes and were not abolished by the presence of experimental scotomata. The hemispheric asymmetry was related to handedness (left-handers had larger amplitudes in the right hemisphere, right-handers in the left hemisphere), but not to sex. Hemispheric asymmetries in VEPs latency were not present. In comparison to males, females showed larger amplitudes and shorter latencies. These results point out that hemispheric asymmetries are found also for the processing of elementary visual stimuli like checkerboards, and they depend both on stimulus parameters (field size) and subject variables (handedness).Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjectsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1987
- Effect of central scotomata on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with maculopathy and healthy subjectsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986
- Pattern reversal evoked potentials: Age, sex and hemispheric asymmetryElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- Hemispheric asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in patients with well-defined occipital lesionsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. I. Normal subjectsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1982
- Simultaneously Recorded Retinal and Cortical Potentials Elicited by Checkerboard StimuliPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- The effect of experimental ‘scotomata’ on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-fieldElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978
- The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977
- A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked responseNature, 1976
- Cortical responses to stimulation of the human foveaVision Research, 1968