Double‐blind randomized controlled trial of isoxicam vs piroxicam in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 22 (S2) , 149S-155S
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb02997.x
Abstract
1 Fifty‐seven elderly patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip and knee were entered into a double‐blind, randomized, controlled parallel group trail to compare the efficacy and tolerability of isoxicam (maximum = 200 mg day‐1) and piroxicam (maximum = 20 mg day‐ 1). 2 Clinical assessments were made following a 1 week NSAID‐free washout period and at biweekly intervals during the next 6 weeks of active treatment. 3 The majority of patients in both groups experienced a clinically important and statistically significant therapeutic response. 4 No statistically significant between‐group differences were noted with respect to drug efficacy. 5 One patient was withdrawn from the piroxicam group because of lack of effect, but there were no such withdrawals from the isoxicam group. 6 Five patients were withdrawn from the piroxicam group because of adverse reactions compared to only one withdrawal from the isoxicam group. 7 This study indicates that isoxicam is an efficacious and well‐tolerated once‐daily NSAID for elderly patients with osteoarthritis.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: The case for standardisationClinical Rheumatology, 1984
- Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of isoxicamSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1982
- An articular index for the assessment of osteoarthritis.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1981
- Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Osteo-arthrosis and Disk Degeneration in an Urban PopulationAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1958