Five Types of Ambiguity: Scientific Uncertainty in Risk Assessment
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials
- Vol. 4 (2) , 139-150
- https://doi.org/10.1089/hwm.1987.4.139
Abstract
The application of risk assessment methodologies for developing scientifically based policies for risk reduction is limited by continuing uncertainties. However, too often these uncertainties are abused in the process of risk management by a too-rigid separation between scientific and managerial input into decisionmaking. This separation obscures the scientific origins of uncertainty, or incorrectly exaggerates the variance functions of statistics or confuses the epidemiological bases of individual and population based risk estimates. Decisionmaking which encourages the divorce between science and policy will result in further distortions and abuses of uncertainty.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Criteria for Evidence of Chemical CarcinogenicityScience, 1984
- Health implications of 2,3,7,8‐tetrachloro‐dibenzodioxin (TCDD) contamination of residential soilJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1984
- Quantitative Approaches in Use to Assess Cancer RiskRisk Analysis, 1983
- Dietary Carcinogens and AnticarcinogensScience, 1983
- Cell transformation by chemical agents — A review and analysis of the literature: A report of the U.S. environmental protection agency Gene-Tox ProgramMutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1983
- Implication of Nonlinear Kinetics on Risk Estimation in CarcinogenesisScience, 1983
- The use of safety factors for controlling riskJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1983
- Carcinogen Policy at EPAScience, 1983
- Current status of neurotoxicology, basic and appliedTrends in Neurosciences, 1982
- Quantitative Theories of CarcinogenesisSIAM Review, 1978