The influence of different experimental methods on the measured energy dependence of stopping powers
- 1 August 1985
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
- Vol. 12 (1) , 56-61
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583x(85)90700-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Proton energy loss in solidsNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1984
- Investigation of hydrogen stopping in noble metals around the stopping power maximumNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1984
- Measurement of the stopping cross section for protons in copper by backscattering using various methods for foil-thickness determinationNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 1984
- Search for an influence of the measuring method on stopping cross section data near the maximumNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 1983
- Energy calibration at several hundred keV by time-of-flight and by comparing protons with H2+ ionsNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 1983
- Double scattering in Rutherford backscattering spectraNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 1982
- On the determination of optimum depth-resolution conditions for rutherford backscattering analysisNuclear Instruments and Methods, 1978
- Polycrystalline film target texture and nuclear backscattering analysisNuclear Instruments and Methods, 1978
- Stopping Power of Al, Cu, Ag, Au, Pb, and U for 5—18-MeV Protons and DeuteronsPhysical Review B, 1973
- Energy loss of protons in thin films of carbon, aluminium and silverRadiation Effects, 1971