Efficacy of mupirocin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus burn wound infection
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 33 (8) , 1358-1361
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.33.8.1358
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MRSA) have become increasingly prevalent as nosocomial pathogens, especially in burn wounds. MRSA constituted 38% of all S. aureus isolates in our 25-bed burns unit despite the utilization of a combination of 1% silver sulfadiazine and 0.2% chlorhexidine as topical therapy. Mupirocin, a new antibiotic, has proved in vitro and in vivo to be highly effective in the treatment of MRSA infections. A prospective clinical trial with mupirocin ointment in MRSA burn wound infection was untertaken. Forty-five children with 59 discrete burn wounds and from whom MRSA were isolated were treated with 2% mupirocin ointment under occlusive dressings, applied twice daily for 5 days. The average burned area treated was 8% (range, 2 to 20%) of the total body surface area. The burn wounds were assessed clinically and bacteriologically daily. Mupirocin eliminated MRSA in all 59 wounds treated, with the maximum therapeutic response seen within 4 days. In three wounds, gram-negative organisms persisted after 5 days of topical therapy. Treatment was well tolerated by all children. We recommend that mupirocin in its present polyethylene glycol base should be used only on a selective basis, when current prophylactic topical therapy has failed to control MRSA infection in burns of less than 20% of the total body surface area, and that it should be applied only for a limited period of 5 days. The safety and the efficacy of mupirocin in burns exceeding 20% of the total body surface area need to be established.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiological determination of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of clinical and genetically derived isolatesJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1986
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at childrenʼs hospitals in the United StatesThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1985
- METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN A LONDON HOSPITALThe Lancet, 1985
- Control and Eradication of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureuson a Surgical UnitNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Prospective comparison of silver sulfadiazine 1 per cent plus chlorhexidine digluconate 0·2 per cent (Silvazine) and silver sulfadiazine 1 per cent (Flamazine) as prophylaxis against burn wound infectionBurns, 1984
- PSEUDOMONIC ACID: A NEW TOPICAL ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTThe Lancet, 1983
- Polyethylene glycol intoxication in burn patientsBurns, 1982
- Choice of chemotherapy for infection by Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1982
- An Outbreak of Infections Caused by Strains of Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Methicillin and Aminoglycosides. I. Clinical StudiesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- A NEW TYPE OF PENICILLIN RESISTANCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUSThe Lancet, 1977