MEASUREMENT ERROR IN CALLS‐FOR‐SERVICE AS AN INDICATOR OF CRIME*
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 35 (4) , 705-726
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01236.x
Abstract
Several recent studies have used records of calls‐for‐service (CFS) to police 911 centers to measure crime at the address, neighborhood, and city level. This article examines the limitations of this “new” indicator of crime. After pointing out several types of error in dispatch records, we use data from an observational study of policing in 60 neighborhoods to examine empirically how these errors might bias CFS‐based crime counts and discuss the consequences of such bias. We conclude with suggestions for future research on the validity of CFS as an indicator of crime.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of multiple indicators to estimate crime trends in American citiesJournal of Criminal Justice, 1993
- THE EFFECT OF LONGITUDINAL ARREST PATTERNS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROBBERY TRENDS AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEVEL *Criminology, 1990
- Household Characteristics, Neighborhood Composition and Victimization RiskSocial Forces, 1989
- Household Characteristics, Neighborhood Composition and Victimization RiskSocial Forces, 1989
- THEY IS CLOWNING TOUGH: 911 AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY*Criminology, 1989
- Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- ARE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS A VALID INDICATOR OF THE INDEX CRIMES? AN AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER WITH MINOR QUALIFICATIONS*Criminology, 1985
- An Interviewer Variance Study for the Eight Impact Cities of the National Crime Survey Cities SampleJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- Theory, Deduction, and Rules of CorrespondenceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1969
- Scaling Delinquent BehaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 1957