Impact of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Size Homoplasy on the Estimation of Population Genetic Diversity and the Detection of Selective Loci
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 179 (1) , 539-554
- https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.083246
Abstract
AFLP markers are becoming one of the most popular tools for genetic analysis in the fields of evolutionary genetics and ecology and conservation of genetic resources. The technique combines a high-information content and fidelity with the possibility of carrying out genomewide scans. However, a potential problem with this technique is the lack of homology of bands with the same electrophoretic mobility, what is known as fragment-size homoplasy. We carried out a theoretical analysis aimed at quantifying the impact of AFLP homoplasy on the estimation of within- and between-neutral population genetic diversity in a model of a structured finite population with migration among subpopulations. We also investigated the performance of a currently used method (DFDIST software) to detect selective loci from the comparison between genetic differentiation and heterozygosis of dominant molecular markers, as well as the impact of AFLP homoplasy on its effectiveness. The results indicate that the biases produced by homoplasy are: (1) an overestimation of the frequency of the allele determining the presence of the band, (2) an underestimation of the degree of differentiation between subpopulations, and (3) an overestimation or underestimation of the heterozygosis, depending on the allele frequency of the markers. The impact of homoplasy is quickly diminished by reducing the number of fragments analyzed per primer combination. However, substantial biases on the expected heterozygosity (up to 15–25%) may occur with ∼50–100 fragments per primer combination. The performance of the DFDIST software to detect selective loci from dominant markers is highly dependent on the number of selective loci in the genome and their average effects, the estimate of genetic differentiation chosen to be used in the analysis, and the critical bound probability used to detect outliers. Overall, the results indicate that the software should be used with caution. AFLP homoplasy can produce a reduction of up to 15% in the power to detect selective loci.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tagging the Signatures of Domestication in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by Means of Pooled DNA SamplesAnnals of Botany, 2007
- The Utility of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms in Phylogenetics: A Comparison of Homology within and between GenomesSystematic Biology, 2007
- Almost Forgotten or Latest Practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advancesTrends in Plant Science, 2007
- Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals?Molecular Ecology, 2005
- Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers as characters for phylogenetic inferencePerspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2005
- Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLPTM bands in Echinacea — implications for comparative biological studiesGenome, 2004
- The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A Platform for Comparative GenomicsPLoS Biology, 2003
- AFLP genotyping and fingerprintingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1999
- AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprintingNucleic Acids Research, 1995
- Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided PopulationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1973