Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-53
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545019
Abstract
Much of our understanding of children's reading has been based on research with narratives, where children can rely on relatively rich prior knowledge to make sense of the text. Far less work has been conducted on children's meaning construction processes for nonnarrative, informational texts about unfamiliar topics, such as those often encountered in school content areas. This research examines children's strategies for processing informational text to understand and remember new information. In Experiment 1, 4th‐ and 6th‐grade students thought aloud as they read an easier and a harder passage. They dictated a recall report after each passage. The think‐aloud protocols were analyzed for processing activities, including paraphrasing, elaborating, explaining, monitoring, and identifying and resolving problems. In general, processing tended to focus on the local, sentence level. Self‐explanations were prevalent throughout the protocols; however, they were differentially effective in promoting understanding. Content analyses of 5 cases illustrate complex relations between processing activities and the completeness and coherence of participants’ recall reports. In Experiment 2, new samples of 4th‐ and 6th‐grade students read the same passages silently. The think‐aloud procedure in Experiment 1 encouraged readers to process each sentence successively and more elaborately, with little overt looking back. In contrast, silent readers (Experiment 2) engaged in more physical backtracking to previously read sentences. Comparisons of recall performance across experiments indicated that the think‐aloud procedure facilitated the 6th graders’ performance but hindered that of the 4th‐grade students. A multidimensional framework reflecting prior knowledge use and the quality of the textbase is proposed as a general heuristic for conceptualizing learners’ processing and representation construction.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the futureDiscourse Processes, 1997
- Effect of Think-Aloud Instruction on Elementary Students' Comprehension Monitoring AbilitiesJournal of Reading Behavior, 1992
- Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
- Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve ProblemsCognitive Science, 1989
- Strategies for Reading and Studying Expository TextEducational Psychologist, 1987
- Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehensionJournal of Memory and Language, 1986
- Knowledge systems for realistic goals?Discourse Processes, 1982
- Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during readingJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981
- Monitoring and Resolving Comprehension Obstacles: An Investigation of Spontaneous Text Lookbacks among Upper-Grade Good and Poor ComprehendersReading Research Quarterly, 1981
- Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976