Effect of Think-Aloud Instruction on Elementary Students' Comprehension Monitoring Abilities
Open Access
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Reading Behavior
- Vol. 24 (2) , 143-172
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969209547770
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of explicit instruction in think aloud as a means to promote elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Sixty-six fourth-grade students were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: (a) a Think-Aloud (TA) group, in which students were taught various comprehension monitoring strategies for reading stories (e.g., self-questioning, prediction, retelling, rereading) through the medium of thinking aloud; (b) a Directed Reading-Thinking Activity (DRTA) group, in which students were taught a predict-verify strategy for reading and responding to stories; or (c) a Directed Reading Activity (DRA) group, an instructed control, in which students engaged in a noninteractive, guided reading of stories. The primary quantitative analyses involved two planned orthogonal contrasts—effect of instruction (TA + DRTA vs. 2 x DRA) and intensity of instruction (TA vs. DRTA)—for three whole-sample dependent measures: (a) an error detection test, (b) a comprehension monitoring questionnaire, and (c) a modified cloze test. Results of effect of instruction contrasts revealed that TA and DRTA students were more skillful at comprehension monitoring than DRA students (TA + DRTA>DRA for all three measures). Results of intensity of instruction contrasts indicated that although TA-trained students had greater awareness of comprehension monitoring abilities (TA>DRTA for the questionnaire), DRTA students' performance equaled (TA = DRTA for the cloze test) or exceeded (TA<DRTA for the error detection test) that of the TA students. Qualitative data from student interviews, however, revealed that TA students both reported and demonstrated using a greater depth and breadth of comprehension monitoring abilities than either DRTA or DRA students. It was concluded that both TA and DRTA strategies are effective for enhancing elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities but that additional research is needed to determine the relative effectiveness of TA and DRTA approaches.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Inference Training on Comprehension and Comprehension MonitoringReading Research Quarterly, 1987
- Mental Imagery and the Comprehension-Monitoring Performance of Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Poor ReadersReading Research Quarterly, 1986
- Use of Thinking Aloud in Identification and Teaching of Reading Comprehension StrategiesCognition and Instruction, 1985
- On the Use of Verbal Reports in Reading ResearchJournal of Reading Behavior, 1984
- Comparison of Comprehension Monitoring of Skilled and Less Skilled ReadersReading Research Quarterly, 1984
- Second Graders’ Strategic Preferences While Reading Basal StoriesThe Journal of Educational Research, 1984
- Metamemory: A Critical ExaminationChild Development, 1982
- Verbal reports as data.Psychological Review, 1980
- Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text ConfusionsJournal of Reading Behavior, 1979
- The Development of Memory: Knowing, Knowing About Knowing, and Knowing How to KnowAdvances in Child Development and Behavior, 1975