ECG-correlated imaging of the heart with subsecond multislice spiral CT

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The new spiral multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners and the significant increase in rotation speed offer great potential for cardiac imaging with X-ray CT. We have therefore developed the dedicated cardiac reconstruction algorithms 180 degrees multislice cardio interpolation (MCI) and 180 degrees multislice cardio delta (MCD) and here offer further details and validation. The algorithm 180 degreesMCI is an electrocardiogram (ECG)-correlated filtering (or weighting) algorithm in both the cardiac phase and in the z-position. Effective scan times (absolute temporal resolution) of as low as t(eff) = 56 ms are possible, assuming M 4 simultaneously measured slices at a rotation time of t(rot) = 0.5 s and S < or = d < or = 3S for the table feed d per rotation, where S denotes the collimated slice thickness. The relative temporal resolution w (fraction of the heart cycle depicted in the image), which is the more important parameter in cardiac imaging, will then be as low as w = 12.5% of the heart cycle. The second approach, 180 degreesMCD, is an ECG-correlated partial scan reconstruction of 180 degrees + delta data with delta << phi (fan-angle). Its absolute temporal resolution lies in the order of 250 ms (for the central ray, i.e., for the center of rotation), and the relative temporal resolution w increases with increasing heart rate, e.g., from typically w = 25% at fH = 60 min(-1) to w = 50% at fH = 120 min(-1), assuming again t(rot) = 0.5 s. For validation purposes, we have done simulations of a virtual cardiac motion phantom, measurements of a dedicated cardiac calibration and motion phantom, and we have reconstructed patient data with simultaneously acquired ECG. Both algorithms significantly improve the image quality compared with the standard reconstruction algorithms 180 degrees multislice linear interpolation (MLI) and 180 degrees multislice filtered interpolation (MFI). However, 180 degreesMCI is clearly superior to 180 degreesMCD for all heart rates. This is best illustrated by multiplanar reformations (MPR) or other three-dimensional (3-D) displays of the volume. 180 degreesMCI, due to its higher temporal resolution, is best for spatial and temporal four-dimensional (4-D) tracking of the anatomy. A tunable scanner rotation time to avoid resonance behavior of the heart rate and the scanner's rotation and shorter rotation times would be of further benefit.