Analysis of clustered matched‐pair data
- 14 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (15) , 2417-2428
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1438
Abstract
Evaluation of the performance of a new diagnostic procedure with respect to a standard procedure arises frequently in practice. The response of interest, often in a dichotomous form, is measured twice, once with each procedure. The two procedures are administered to either two matched individuals, or when practical, to the same individual. A large sample test for matched‐pair data is the McNemar test. The main assumption of this test is independent paired responses; however, when more than one outcome from an individual is measured by each procedure, the data are clustered. Examples of such cases can be seen in dental and ophthalmology studies. Variance adjustment methods for the analysis of clustered matched‐pair data have been proposed; however, because of unequal cluster sizes, variability of correlation structures within a cluster (within paired responses in a cluster as well as between paired responses in a cluster), and unequal success probabilities among the clusters, the performances of some available methods are not consistent. This research proposes a simple adjustment to the McNemar test for the analysis of clustered matched‐pair data. Method of moments is used to calculate a consistent variance estimator. Using Monte Carlo simulation, the size and power of the proposed test are compared to those of two currently available methods. To illustrate practical application, clustered matched‐pair data from two clinical studies are analysed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: An introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modellingStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Estimation and sample size considerations for clustered binary responsesStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site‐specific diagnostic testsJournal of Periodontal Research, 1990
- Adjustment of Frequently Used Chi-square Procedures for the Effect of Site-to-Site Dependencies in the Analysis of Dental DataJournal of Dental Research, 1989
- Analysis of Site-specific Data in Dental StudiesJournal of Dental Research, 1988
- The Prediction Approach to Robust Variance Estimation in Two-Stage Cluster SamplingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- On the Asymptotic Distribution of Ratio and Regression EstimatorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960