Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (12) , 1249.e1-1249.e11
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupBMJ, 2004
- Where now for meta-analysis?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Effects of Intensity of Rehabilitation After StrokeStroke, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Methods of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Health Services ResearchPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Clinical trials of homoeopathy.BMJ, 1991
- Acupuncture and chronic pain: A criteria-based meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981