Detecting Selection Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials
- 14 July 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 20 (4) , 319-327
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00014-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of estimation and biasing strategies on selection bias in clinical trials with permuted blocksPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1998
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Threats to the Validity of Clinical Trials Employing Enrichment Strategies for Sample SelectionControlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- A Trial of RSV Immune Globulin in Infants and Young Children: The FDA's ViewNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Effect of Enalapril on Mortality and the Development of Heart Failure in Asymptomatic Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection FractionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Effect of Enalapril on Survival in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions and Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Ascorbic Acid for the Common ColdJAMA, 1975