A double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two dose regimens of oral granisetron in preventing acute emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
- 1 July 1996
- Vol. 78 (1) , 144-151
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<144::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-z
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to define an optimal administration schedule of granisetron for patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy by comparing the antiemetic efficacy and safety of 2 mg of the drug administered orally. METHODS In this double‐blind, randomized, parallel study, 2‐dose regimens of oral granisetron were evaluated in 697 adult cancer patients. Patients were stratified by gender and randomized to receive 2 mg oral granisetron, either as a divided dose given 1 hour prior to chemotherapy and 12 hours after the start of chemotherapy, or as a single dose 1 hour prior to chemotherapy at Cycle 1. The primary efficacy endpoints assessed were the percentage of patients with complete response (no nausea, no emesis, and no additional antiemetic medication during the 24‐hour post‐chemotherapy interval) and the incidence of emesis and nausea. Following completion of Cycle 1, patients were given the opportunity to receive open‐label granisetron (2 mg once daily) on the first day of each remaining cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS No statistically significant differences in any of the endpoints were observed between the two treatment groups. Approximately 50% of patients in both treatment groups achieved complete response. The proportion of patients with no episodes of emesis occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups. Approximately 52% of patients in either treatment group were free of nausea during the postchemotherapy period. There was no difference between treatment groups regarding the use of antiemetic rescue medication. Finally, the incidence of adverse experiences was similar for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Both dose regimens of oral granisetron were similarly effective in controlling nausea and vomiting in the 24‐hour interval following chemotherapy. Granisetron was well tolerated with few adverse events attributable to the study drug. Cancer 1996;78:144‐51.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Importance of nauseaCancer Nursing, 1994
- The control of acute cisplatin-induced emesis – a comparative study of granisetron and a combination regimen of high-dose metoclopramide and dexamethasoneBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Intravenous granisetron — establishing the optimal doseEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- Serotonin Antagonists: A New Class of Antiemetic AgentsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991
- Ondansetron Compared with High-Dose Metoclopramide in Prophylaxis of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and VomitingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- The biological significance of soluble interleukin-2 receptors in solid tumorsEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Dose ranging phase I study of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- The Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and VomitingMedical Clinics of North America, 1987
- On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983
- Incidence of nausea and vomiting with cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective randomised trial of antiemetics.BMJ, 1979