Defibrillation efficacy. Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination.
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 69 (1) , 45-51
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.69.1.45
Abstract
When an automatic defibrillator is implanted, it is essential to determine the efficacy of the defibrillating system accurately, while balancing the need to keep the number of fibrillation episodes to a minimum. Two methods have evolved to assess defibrillation efficacy: 1) the "defibrillation threshold," which requires few ventricular fibrillation episodes, and 2) the "dose-response curve," which requires many ventricular fibrillation episodes and relates percent success to energy. The purpose of this study was to compare these two methods directly. Twenty open-chest anesthetized pigs had triplicate defibrillation threshold determinations. To produce a dose-response curve, six shocks then were delivered at 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, and 2.0 times the mean defibrillation threshold, in a balanced randomized order, during separate episodes of ventricular fibrillation. The data were fitted by logistic regression, conversions of the logistic regression, and a saturable exponential and nonsaturable growth exponential. A comparison was made of the mean defibrillation threshold and the 50% point on the dose-response curve (ED50) for each model, for each animal. In addition, the reliability of each measure was assessed by comparing the coefficients of variation. There was no statistical difference between the group defibrillation threshold (6.6 +/- 0.5 J) and group ED50 values (ED50 range of the models, 5.7 +/- 1.9 to 7.0 +/- 0.9 J). However, the variability about the defibrillation threshold was less than that of the ED50 values for all mathematical models except the true logistic equation, which was virtually the same.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Defibrillation Success Rate Versus Energy Relationship: Part I-Curve Fitting and the Most Efficient Defibrillation EnergyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- The defibrillation threshold: How many measurements are enough?American Heart Journal, 1989
- Flecainide Acetate Does Not Alter the Energy Requirements for Direct Ventricular Defibrillation Using Sequential Puise Defibrillation in PigsJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1988
- Internal Ventricular Defibrillation with Sequential Pulse Countershock in Pigs: Comparison with Single Pulses and Effects of Pulse SeparationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1987
- The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” conceptAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Defibrillation Threshold: A Simple and Quantitative Estimate of the Ability to DefibrillatePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1987
- Lidocaine causes a reversible, concentration-dependent increase in defibrillation energy requirementsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- Improved internal defibrillation with twin pulse sequential energy delivery to different lead orientations in pigsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size: IIAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTIONBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1965